×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Impact Model For companies of the Coconut Supply Chain

Thanks for giving your inputs by 23 February 2026

Dear Members,

We are pleased to share with you a draft Impact Model for companies operating across the coconut supply chain, and we would very much value your input at this stage.

Please add your comments directly in the document using the commenting function of the platform. Inline comments are preferred, as they help us understand precisely which elements you are reacting to (assumptions, indicators, pathways, terminology, gaps, etc.). 

We kindly ask you to share your comments by Feb 23rd, 2026, so we can consolidate feedback and move to the next iteration.

Your perspectives are essential to ensure the model is practical, credible, and truly reflective of how impact is created in real-world coconut supply chains.

Thank you in advance for your engagement.

File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-

Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment. Select a bubble to view comments.

Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio

Comments

View all Cancel

Suggestion
This impact funded initiative should make sure to align with the current and upcoming regulation (CSRD/CSDDD) and the major voluntary frameworks (SBTI, SBTN, GHG protocol LSRS)
Question
Agreeable with this scope and it aligns well with SCP Origin topics. However, it would be helpful to have additional information on whether the SIM could also be used to put on the market Origin verified volumes or do the two mechanisms remain completely independent?
Question
Timelines seem reasonable. Unclear when the selection/election of SIP members will be in this timeline?
Suggestion
Governance should also include guideline to avoid/manage conflicts of interest in project selection/funding allocation.
Suggestion
I like this 'additionality' principle in this context. It supports funding where it is not currently available.